In many conversations that are trying to be serious about climate the participants come to a strategic choice. Do we stay objective, or positive? My working assumption, supported by observations in community, organizations, and online, is that reality motivates while false optimism lessens the sense that something utterly different needs to emerge. But the collapse of morale in the face of being fully objective is also real. Perhaps its cultural, the habits of thought of the population - stoicism vs consumerism, or working together rather than being trapped in our isolating homes.
Discussion about this post
No posts