Problem with many participants, and too many new conversations. Bad math.
# 3042
As the impact of climate change is increasing, and it’s presence in the news more front page. Many more people are activated to have opinions and to want to express them. If we go from 100 participants to ten conversations, we have an average of 10 participants per conversation. But if the number of participants doubles to 200 and the number of sides goes up to 30, the number of participants per site decreases. The experience of the writers is that fewer people are following them, which is exactly true. So the tsunami of new postings, Institute , forums, seminars and press conferences is leading to a breakdown of communication.
How can we shift beyond the fire hydrants of disconnected and fragmented content creations to an ecology of stories that addresses our complex web of self-inflicted wicked problems in the 21st-century?